Al Gore has been taking quite a beating this last week over the now very tenuous link between carbon emissions and global temperatures. Today is no different.
AJ Strata - NASA Discovers 70% Of Global Climate Due To Pacific Ocean Oscillations - Not CO2
Say they reduced the CO2 25%. Say the CO2 is the driver for the remaining 30% of Global Warming (which it cannot be, but let’s just be only half as ridiculous as the IPCC), then all that effort would only impact 7.5% of the forces driving the global climate. The other 92.5% would roll on, impervious to the effort. And since CO2 is not 100% of the remaining 30% of the equation (more like 10%), a more realistic expectation is that all the suffering that would go into dropping CO2 levels by 25% would result in a less than 1% change in the forces driving our climate.
In other words, you might as well light a match to all that money because it would have no effect, you would be throwing it away on a fool’s errand.
Spend trillions of dollars to have a near zero impact. Makes sense to me.
Recent comments