Obama a Creature of the Drive-By Media

Tagged:

Of course, we knew that already, but The Media Research Center has done an extensive report detailing just how Barack Obama soared past presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton to win the Democrat 's nomination for president. The exhaustive study came up with startling conclusions from its research:

Read on.....

Quote:
It was the closest nomination contest in a generation, with just one-tenth of a percentage point — 41,622 votes out of more than 35 million cast — separating Barack Obama from Hillary Clinton when the Democratic primaries ended in June. Obama’s margin among elected delegates was almost as thin, just 51 to 48 percent.

Why did this young man vault from relative obscurity to a stunning victory over the hither-to thought impregnable Clinton "Machine?" You know the answer already---a total and complete media bias in favor of Obama & against any opponents:

Quote:
Barack Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks. At every step of his national political career, network reporters showered the Illinois Senator with glowing media coverage, building him up as a political celebrity and exhibiting little interest in investigating his past associations or exploring the controversies that could have threatened his campaign.

This study will be relegated to the non-news section if at all, but it does bear very much attention because it is so thorough:

Quote:
the key findings of the Media Research Center’s exhaustive analysis of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage of Barack Obama — every story, every soundbite, every mention — from his first appearance on a network broadcast in May 2000 through the end of the Democratic primaries in June 2008, a total of 1,365 stories..... found that the networks’ coverage — particularly prior to the formal start of Obama’s presidential campaign — bordered on giddy celebration of a political "rock star" rather than objective newsgathering.

Although any sentient being with an IQ over 80 might have noticed the same conclusion, the actual numbers are mind-boggling:

Quote:
# The three broadcast networks treated Obama to nearly seven times more good press than bad — 462 positive stories (34% of the total), compared with only 70 stories (just 5%) that were critical.

# NBC Nightly News was the most lopsided, with 179 pro-Obama reports (37%), more than ten times the number of anti-Obama stories (17, or 3%). The CBS Evening News was nearly as skewed, with 156 stories spun in favor of Obama (38%), compared to a mere 21 anti-Obama reports (5%). ABC’s World News was the least slanted, but still tilted roughly four-to-one in Obama’s favor (127 stories to 32, or 27% to 7%).

# Barack Obama received his best press when it mattered most, as he debuted on the national scene. All of the networks lavished him with praise when he was keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic Convention, and did not produce a single negative story about Obama (out of 81 total reports) prior to the start of his presidential campaign in early 2007.

# The networks downplayed or ignored major Obama gaffes and scandals. Obama’s relationship with convicted influence peddler Tony Rezko was the subject of only two full reports (one each on ABC and NBC) and mentioned in just 15 other stories. CBS and NBC also initially downplayed controversial statements from Obama’s longtime pastor Jeremiah Wright, but heavily praised Obama’s March 18 speech on race relations.

# While Obama’s worst media coverage came during the weeks leading up to the Pennsylvania primary on April 22, even then the networks offered two positive stories for every one that carried a negative spin (21% to 9%). Obama’s best press of the year came after he won the North Carolina primary on May 6 — after that, 43 percent of stories were favorable to Obama, compared to just one percent that were critical.

# The networks minimized Obama’s liberal ideology, only referring to him as a "liberal" 14 times in four years. In contrast, reporters found twice as many occasions (29) to refer to Obama as either a "rock star," "rising star" or "superstar" during the same period.

# In covering the campaign, network reporters highlighted voters who offered favorable opinions about Obama. Of 147 average citizens who expressed an on-camera opinion about Obama, 114 (78%) were pro-Obama, compared to just 28 (19%) that had a negative view, with the remaining five offering a mixed opinion.

The Executive Summary merely tells us what a colossal mountain of factitious and tendentious dishonesty was committed by the broadcast networks:

Quote:
Perhaps if he had faced serious journalistic scrutiny instead of media cheerleading, Barack Obama might still have won his party’s nomination. But the tremendously positive coverage that the networks bestowed upon his campaign was of incalculable value. The early celebrity coverage helped make Obama a nationally-known figure with a near-perfect media image. The protectiveness that reporters showed during the early primaries made it difficult for his rivals to effectively criticize him. And when it came to controversies such as the Wright affair, network reporters acted more as defenders than as journalists in an adversarial relationship. If the media did not actually win the Democratic nomination for Barack Obama, they surely made it a whole lot easier.

I'm going to dive into the PDF version later when I get a little spare time, but right now I must go to worship at my Sarah Palin altar in a corner of my house, where the candles and incense & print-outs from my Apple allow me to contemplate the MSM's humiliation while listening & reading to the gnashing of teeth in their outer darkness.

Life is good, but Sarah has made it much much better.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

called "Political Machine," an idea whose time has come. In the meantime, Palin continues to imitate Ike or vice versa on her effect everywhere, as lots of Dem seats in Congress formerly thought safe are coming into play---throwing Obama's money plans into disarray. On today's Gallup, the Dems formerly had a generic 20-point advantage that has been whittled down to THREE points.

Funny how the MSM has avoided that TINY change.

The University of Missouri.

GO MIZZOU!

Steve Foley's picture

...you have got to contribute here more!

Kill the Cheerleader Kill the World

UCLA/Missouri Schools of Journalism published a similar study three years ago which exhaustively PROVED that the ginormous majority of the MSM were to the far left, using the ADA [Americans for Democratic Action] ratings of US Congress as a benchmark. This marvelous compilation sank like a stone in the media because it outed them as terminally fraudulent [from CBS & the LAT/NYT on the 75% liberal to the very center [FoxNEWS, Drudge, WSJ]. There were no national media outlets on the under 50% liberal cut-off line! ZERO. Even Fox & Drudge cover so much sludge that they somehow came off as fair-and-balanced around the fifty-year line.

BTW, Mizzou has a QB named Daniels who is lighting up the scoreboard today. As a St. Louis U. Billiken, I am not amused!

speciallist's picture

First it was on my board in my office....then I moved it out to the Kitchen comp board

Next Covert Op will be to put it up on the Fridge...it's sad ...My wife hates sarah

and she doesn't know why...lol.....I mock her...so sue me

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

gamecock's picture

house decided to pay a 28 yr old for his memoir and why?

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

Gamer, I had some true BLUE [old-fashioned] Repubs last night and we discussed how a weird outsider like Obambi could have slithered front and center into the national limelight. I thought that the fact that when Michelle Robinson went to clerk/intern at Kirkland & Ellis [two floors down from my cubicle with a window in the Amoco Bldg in Chicago] was "mentored" by none other than Bernardine Dohrn, a "paralegal" [felons can't pass the bar, even in Illinois] at the firm. Then a year later, the chain-smoking wide-eared Obambi was invited at Michelle's behest to follow the same Yellow Brick Road to K & E. Just another clue or Ariadne's thread to how this young'un got selected by the Crime Ring called the DNC.

Obambi started to levitate so early, one wonders what other pieces of the puzzle are there, including his recommendation by a guy who is now an Islamic Militant with tenure to get into Harvard Law School. Not that I'm saying BHO is a Muslim, mind you......

And the fact that his collaboration with Bill Ayers on The Annenberg Project has been totally erased and covered up is another clue. Obambi is an Alinsky acolyte, which is a polite term for closet Marxist. [Hillary wrote her undergrad thesis on Alinsky, hmmm.....]

Finally, what happened to Obambi's Columbia U. transcripts, his GPA, his thesis ["lost it," he says] and the records of his State Senate Campaign contributions and financing [also "lost," he says].

If we had a balanced media in the USA, some investigative sleuth would have uncovered some scintilla of evidence on this, but it's all hushed up. Unlike Sarah Palin's cousin-in-law from Hell who tasered his stepson & is protected by a union.

Did I mention Tony Rezko or Rev. W[rong]???